Justice
Rita Ofili-Ajumogobia of a Federal High Court sitting in Lagos yesterday
sentenced former Director General of Nigerian Maritime Administration and
Safety Agency, NIMASA, Raymond Omatseye to a five-year jail term over N1.5
billion contract scam. Ex-NIMASA DG, Omatseye Ex-NIMASA DG, Omatseye Omatseye
was charged to court by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission EFCC on a
27-counts charge bordering on bid rigging and contract splitting.
Chief Godwin
Obla (SAN) appeared as lead counsel for the EFCC, while Mr Edoka Oneyeke
appeared for the convict. Delivering her judgment yesterday, Justice Rita
Ofili-Ajumogobia found Omatseye guilty in 24 out of the 27 counts preferred
against him but discharged and acquitted him in three counts bordering on bid rigging.
The Judge found Omatseye guilty of the offence of awarding contracts above
stipulated threshold. In her judgement, the Judge held that “in the instant
charge, the defendant testified in his evidence in chief that he was released
on administrative bail and asked to come back the following day and in his
statement, he responded that his threshold for supply was N2.5 million.
“Furthermore, his statement was corroborated by Pw2 and Pw3; Pw2 stated in his
testimony that in line with the Public Procurement Act, the Chief Executive
officer had a threshold of N2.5 million for goods and N5 million for works.
“From the foregoing, I find that the exhibit PD 16 A-Y are all above the
threshold and approved limit of the DG; that means, they are all above N2.5 million.
“The testimony of Pw2 and Pw3 that the approved threshold of the defendant on
goods and services was N2.5million does not only corroborate the statement of
the defendant, but totally lends credence to the threshold limit applicable on
the defendant as DG of NIMASA.
“I find that the threshold as contained in
exhibit PD 16 Z is applicable to the defendant, setting his limit as N2.5
million for procurement of goods, and N5 million for procurement of services.
“A calm perusal of exhibit PD 16 series reveals that they are repetitive awards
of contract for the supply of goods approved by the defendant in his position
as DG of NIMASA.’
0 comments:
Post a Comment